30 November 2011

Differences Concept IPL Vs Concept ISL

The concept of the IPL League Indonesia are in one company (consortium), so all the clubs funded consortium, with the consequence of tickets, broadcast rights and others entered the PSSI (consortium, red).


This is why the shares underlying 70% to Djohar, 30% to Faried. It is already running on LPI competition last season, but it can be said of last season is a project statement, why?

With billions of dollars the amount of money that has been distributed to 20 clubs LPI consortium last season, marquee player contracts, salaries for foreign referee, turned out to interest the audience for the LPI is very less. Since most of the new klub2 without a strong base of supporters, quiet the audience, had finally sold to sponsors.

This concept is applied to try this season, with seats that PSSI leadership already in their hands, the consortium tried to apply these concepts in the competition this season, but collided with the presence of big clubs that have stood for decades.

Why? Because the clubs are able to get sponsors themselves, without needing the help of the consortium. Finally PSSI pursued all means try them,

1. Fatten the competition to 36 and after many protests to 24, why why not 18 teams wrote, according to the statutes? Yes because of the 18 ISL teams last season, mostly not 'his team consortium' means not a turnover. Finally ditambahlah 6 stealth team, which incidentally 'consortium team', or sponsor messages.

2. Memergerkan LPI teams with ISL, FC with Persija Jakarta example, it can be said to take over a subtle, because we know the great potential of The Jak Mania Persija with her.

Some of the club managed to fight, the result is what? Timbulah dualism, Persebaya 1927-Persebaya Vishnu, Arema M Nuh-Arema Renda, Persija (Jakarta FC)-Paul Persija, PSMS PSMS IPL-ISL and almost arise Persib 1933. Klub2 above are big clubs with a strong base of supporters, you can imagine the profits earned by the consortium?

There is nothing wrong with the concept of the consortium, provided the whole team is a consortium team, the entire cost of the consortium, with reciprocity, the ticket is not completely to the club, partly to the consortium, the division of broadcasting rights, sponsorship and the benefits to the consortium. But this will not be run if the league is only a small percentage who would become his team consortium.

While the concept of ISL, the club looking for his own money, looking for sponsors themselves, but the benefits of competition so forth to the club (99% club, 1% PSSI) because at this club concept was bloody finance themselves. This concept was adopted by most European competitions.

There's nothing wrong with it duakonsep, the problem is when the clubs with the two concepts are merged into one competition. The club is certainly not a problem when a consortium of broadcasting rights, ticket money, sponsor enter into the consortium, because after all they did not spend any money for operational expenses and club contracts.

But for those clubs who support themselves naturally objected, because they finance themselves. Want 7malam meetings 7 days will not see the point of intersection.

Even if the team IPL with 24 runs, there is the possibility of the consortium will seek to defend and maintain the existence of the clubs in the IPL, and degrading nonkonsorsium clubs. A latent danger.

According to my personal opinion, this concept is not presented by the PSSI since the beginning, which raised suspicion. They should have from the beginning to offer their ideas to the 18 teams are eligible to appear in the ISL.

If they agree then Live the, if not, so do not be forced, because they sit in that chair because it was chosen by the member clubs of PSSI. PSSI is happening now like to impose its will, justifies any means, without ignoring the aspirations of the clubs members, ultimately all the decisions around there hit a hit here.

source: Breath Arema

No comments:

Post a Comment